IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 60, Issue. 5, PP. 1304 - 1312, 2018, DOI: 10.1109/TEMC.2017.2773271

Evaluating Characteristics of Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) Events in Wearable Medical Devices: Comparison With the IEC 61000-4-2 Standard


Aniket Bhandare 1, Li Guan1, David Pommerenke1, Mehdi Kohani 2, Michael G. Pecht2
1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, USA
2CALCE, Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20740, USA

Abstract:

Electrostatic discharge (ESD) malfunctions in wearable medical devices have resulted in injuries and deaths. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends medical device manufacturers to qualify the electromagnetic compatibility of their products according to the IEC 60601-1-2 collateral standard, within which the IEC 61000-4-2 standard is the recommended ESD immunity test method. This paper shows that the IEC 61000-4-2 standard does not provide adequate immunity for wearable medical devices, due to the differences between the test setup and the real usage. The peak and maximum time derivative of the ESD current and transient magnetic fields were measured during realistic discharge scenarios, where a metal piece, in lieu of a wearable device, was worn around human hand or waist. At five voltage levels from 2 to 10 kV, the peak currents and their maximum time derivatives for realistic discharge scenarios were larger than the most severe discharges obtained from the IEC 61000-4-2 test configuration. This discrepancy between the current results from the IEC 61000-4-2 standard setup and the realistic discharge scenarios indicates that the ESD immunity standard for wearable devices needs to be changed with realistic test configurations, to prevent device malfunctions that can subsequently jeopardize patient safety.

This article is available online here and to CALCE Consortium Members for personal review.

[Home Page] [Articles Page]
Copyright © 2018 by CALCE and the University of Maryland, All Rights Reserved