Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 58-59 (2015) 206217

Evaluating covariance in prognostic and system health management applications

Sandeep Menon1, Xiaohang Jin2, Tommy W.S.Chow2 and Michael Pecht1
1Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States and 2Department of Electronic Engineering, City University of HongKong, HongKong

Abstract:

Developing a diagnostic and prognostic health management system involves analysing system parameters monitored during the lifetime of the system. This data analysis may involve multiple steps, including data reduction, feature extraction, clustering and classification, building control charts, identification of anomalies, and modelling and predicting parameter degradation in order to evaluate the state of health for the system under investigation. Evaluating the covariance between the monitored system parameters allows for better understanding of the trends in monitored system data, and therefore it is an integral part of the data analysis. Typically, a sample covariance matrix is used to evaluate the covariance between monitored system parameters. The monitored system data are often sensor data, which are inherently noisy. The noise in sensor data can lead to inaccurate evaluation of the covariance in data using a sample covariance matrix. This paper examines approaches to evaluate covariance, including the minimum volume ellipsoid, the minimum covariance determinant, and the nearest neighbour variance estimation. When the performance of these approaches was evaluated on datasets with increasing percentage of Gaussian noise, it was observed that the nearest neighbour variance estimation exhibited the most stable estimates of covariance. To improve the accuracy of covariance estimates using nearest neighbour-based methodology, a modified approach for the nearest neighbour variance estimation technique is developed in this paper. Case studies based on data analysis steps involved in prognostic solutions are developed in order to compare the performance of the covariance estimation methodologies discussed in the paper.

Complete article available from the publisher and to the CALCE Consortium Members.



[Home Page] [Articles Page]
Copyright © 2015 by CALCE and the University of Maryland, All Rights Reserved